User Tools

Early Modern Rapier

LongEdge Fencing training materials for rapier and smallsword are constantly under development.

Sources

Each “author” page has a table listing the techniques in the text in a standard format. Soon, I'll be pulling all of these into a concordance and doing some analysis on which techniques are the most common, obviously, core, etc.

The sources which fall within the area of interest of LongEdge Fencing can be found on the List of Source Texts page, which includes summaries and some analysis/interpretation of them.

The main texts for the current project, handling the rapier alone, are listed here for convenience. These pages contain summaries of the basic actions and tactical advice in each text.

Other sources of particular interest include:

  • Camillo Palladini – largely a repetition and commentary on Agrippa
  • Charles Besnard – a text describing the use of transitional rapier/smallsword.

 LEF - Timeline of Core Texts

Andre Des Bordes provides a cute aside to the whole project as he largely plagiarised Palladini almost word for word. In addition, he's the only known fencing master to be executed for witchcraft. We play a dangerous game.

In addition, there is a lot of useful info in later texts. In particular, Jean de Brye's 1721 Art of Fencing Reduced to a Methodical Summary provides good information about how to think about coaching this material.


Research Foci

We're still in the analysing and synthesising stage of researching these texts. The process is three-fold:

  1. Understand each text in itself
  2. Understand the similarities between the texts
  3. Understand the differences between the texts

Small essays on small topics:

Current topics causing continual puzzlement:

  • The “long lunge” versus the “short lunge”. Who prefers which type of lunge and why?
  • De Heredia's “long play” versus “short play”. Is this the same as the long vs short lunge? Or, is it the Italian-style “wide play” vs “close play”?
  • Does the “mathematical play” refer to LVD or to salle fencing (as opposed to fencing in earnest)?

The high-level strategy seems to be do something/anything to make the opponent move their feet.

  • Sword and Dagger: Thrust between the weapons to determine what the opponent will do then take advantage of their mistake.
  • Sword Alone: Subject the opponent's blade to force them to act (advance, retreat, change guard, etc) then take advantage of their mistake.

This website uses cookies. By using the website, you agree with storing cookies on your computer. Also, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Privacy Policy. If you do not agree, please leave the website.

More information