This is known in other rapier traditions as “gaining the blade,” “stringere,” and other names. Cavalcabo and Paternoster include actions which look like a subjection but do not name it. Only de Heredia discusses subjection under its own heading. However, since de Heredia's response to subjecting and being subjected is Cavalcabo's vertical caver, it seems appropriate to include this as part of the tradition as taught.
The aim of subjection, unlike other Italian-based traditions, is not to win the centre line. It is to force your opponent to disengage or to withdraw. The theory is that while your opponent is doing one of these actions, your opponent cannot attack you. This idea is implicit in other traditions and it is made explicit here.
In pairs, both partners adopt the en garde stance.
Repeat this exercise subjecting the opponent's blade on the inside. The response in this case according to de Heredia is to perform a vertical caver and thrust on the firm foot in brocade (seconde). In practice, I find I do this in something more like a tierce than a seconde.
Some notes:
In pairs, both partners adopt the en garde stance.
Repeat this exercise subjecting the opponent's blade on the inside. The action in this case according to de Heredia is to perform a vertical caver and thrust on the firm foot in brocade (seconde). In practice, I find I do as a tierce.
The trigger for this action is noticing that in subjecting your blade your opponent's point is outside your presence. This creates the space along the centre line that you will exploit in the caver.
A more subtle trigger is recognising that the pressure the opponent is exerting to subject you will take his or her point out of your presence as soon as you make the disengage to perform the caver. Sensitivity to this takes some time and practice to master.
The notes in the previous exercise apply equally here.