User Tools

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
lef_kenny_loggins [2024/07/31 20:28] – [Highway to the ....] adminaccountlef_kenny_loggins [2024/08/01 16:24] (current) – [La Zone Dangereuse] adminaccount
Line 3: Line 3:
 (//With absolutely no apologies to Kenny Loggins//) (//With absolutely no apologies to Kenny Loggins//)
  
-There's two parts to this game: one played from engagement, as close to the decision point as possible, as per CLA best practice; and one played starting at wide distance with an approach into engagement.+There's two parts to this game: one played from engagement, as close to the decision point as possible, as per CLA best practice; and one played starting at wide distance with an approach into engagement, more closely matching the "performance environment."
  
 ===== The Danger Zone ===== ===== The Danger Zone =====
Line 42: Line 42:
  
 The complexity added to this extension of the basic game is the approach and picking the right line. In this way, the game more closely matches the fencing situation that will be encountered in the wild. The complexity added to this extension of the basic game is the approach and picking the right line. In this way, the game more closely matches the fencing situation that will be encountered in the wild.
 +
 +===== Further Exploration =====
 +
 +What if .....
 +
 +What if, in the extension game, D refused to allow A to subject their blade, whether by changing blade alignment, xounter-posturing, etc? Does that change the core mechanisms at play here? I'm not sure it does. Fabris talks of approaching an opponent in exactly these terms.
  
  
  
  

This website uses cookies. By using the website, you agree with storing cookies on your computer. Also, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Privacy Policy. If you do not agree, please leave the website.

More information